Soal SMA · Analisis · Kesulitan 3/5
Analyze the logical relationship in the following argument: "If a government invests heavily in renewable energy infrastructure, it will reduce carbon emissions. Country X has significantly reduced carbon emissions. Therefore, Country X must have invested heavily in renewable energy infrastructure." Which of the following best describes the flaw in this argument?
- A.It assumes that the only way to reduce carbon emissions is through renewable energy investment.
- B.It correctly applies deductive reasoning from a conditional statement.
- C.It confuses correlation with causation without providing evidence.
- D.It uses circular reasoning by restating the premise in the conclusion.
Kunci jawaban & pembahasan
Jawaban: It assumes that the only way to reduce carbon emissions is through renewable energy investment.
The argument commits the fallacy of affirming the consequent: other factors could also reduce emissions, so the conclusion does not necessarily follow.
Mau penjelasan yang menyesuaikan level anak?
Xinau AI membahas soal langkah demi langkah, menyesuaikan gaya bahasa dengan usia anak, dan menyusun latihan berikutnya berdasarkan jawaban sebelumnya.
Coba gratis 30 hari