Soal SMA · Analisis · Kesulitan 4/5
Read the following argument: 'Cities that invest in public transportation see reduced traffic congestion. Therefore, if our city builds more bike lanes, traffic congestion will decrease.' Which logical flaw is most evident in this argument?
- A.False dilemma, because it assumes only two solutions exist.
- B.Hasty generalization, because it draws a broad conclusion from a single case.
- C.Non sequitur, because the conclusion about bike lanes does not follow from the premise about public transportation.
- D.Circular reasoning, because the premise assumes what it tries to prove.
Kunci jawaban & pembahasan
Jawaban: Non sequitur, because the conclusion about bike lanes does not follow from the premise about public transportation.
The premise discusses public transportation, while the conclusion shifts to bike lanes without establishing a logical link, making it a non sequitur.
Mau penjelasan yang menyesuaikan level anak?
Xinau AI membahas soal langkah demi langkah, menyesuaikan gaya bahasa dengan usia anak, dan menyusun latihan berikutnya berdasarkan jawaban sebelumnya.
Coba gratis 30 hari